Monday, September 23, 2019

Film analysis Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Film analysis - Essay Example This situation is thematically depicted in the 1992 film â€Å"A Few Good Men† under the screenwriting of Aaron Sorkin and direction by Rob Reiner. Basically, â€Å"A Few Good Men† presents how the intertwined lives of military lawyers Lt. Daniel â€Å"Danny† Kaffee (Tom Cruise) and Lt. Commander JoAnne Galloway (Demi Moore) would be faced with dilemmatic crisis between the duty to abide by orders and the humanitarian responsibility of acting in righteousness to reveal the truth and save the innocent colleagues. In the story, two men of the U.S. Marines distinguished as Pfc. Louden Downey and Lance Cpl. Harold Dawson are alleged to have committed murder on fellow Pfc. William Santiago at the Guantanamo Bay Naval Base. As Kaffee takes charge to defend the side of Downey and Dawson, during the course of investigation, he and Galloway are bound to learn of the ‘code red’ issued by a high-ranking officer who powerfully commands the naval base at Guantana mo. According to Capt. Whitaker, â€Å"A Marine corporal named Dawson illegally fires a round of his weapon over the fence line and into Cuban territory† (Memorable) and Santiago is perceived the risk of becoming a whistleblower to the incident so rather than granting the requested transfer off the base, he is to be kept on Guantanamo ground for training under the supervision of Lt. Jonathan Kendrick (Kiefer Sutherland). Kaffee figures, nevertheless, that Col. Nathan R. Jessup (Jack Nicholson) orders Kendrick the ‘code red’ via Downey and Dawson where Capt. Whitaker particularly confesses in evidence â€Å"Pfc. William Santiago threatens to rat on Dawson to the Naval Investigative Service -- Dawson, and another member of his squad Pfc. Louden Downey, go into Santiago's barracks room, tie him up, stuff a rag down his throat -- An hour later Santiago's dead -- The attending physician says the rag was treated with some kind of toxin† (Memorable). To analyze, Kaffee’s role as a seemingly unscrupulous junior Navy lawyer known to have not at the time gained pertinent trial-on-court experience is utilized to the advantage of Jessup though it is not meant to be divulged as such due to the fact that it only serves being a cover-up. Kaffee, in which case, is expected to understand this purpose and not ever question his disposition on transacting plea bargains which have been his normal line of task even with the assignment of defending the position of his clients who must be made to admit the sole fault of causing Santiago’s death. At the expense of Downey and Dawson, hence, the court proceedings with foul play should be carried out in favor of Jessup who is apparently the principal villain of the story. Then the turning point comes to Kaffee and Galloway as a challenge of whether to get by the typical rule of following instructions or protect the reputation of the two U.S. Marines from unjust ruin. This time, the inexperienced l awyer is caught between two opposing decisions in which choosing the right one would necessarily improve his unfulfilled character. In a conversation with his friend Capt. Ross, Kaffee expresses â€Å"

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.